outtriada.blogg.se

1. #Waves h delay vs supertap pro
2. #Waves h delay vs supertap software
3. #Waves h delay vs supertap license

So they decided, hey, we can sell our plugins for that price, and make it impossible for people to sell their licenses by implementing a license transfer fee roughly equal to the price of the plug-in. Waves was still not happy that people were selling their multi hundred dollar plugins for $30-40.

Now this could have been the end of the story here. This, coupled with users selling their licenses on the used market for a fraction of the price of new, resulted in Waves having to cut prices. With all the competition, charging $600 for a channel strip emulation was kind of a hard sell. This is were things started to crumble for Waves.

#Waves h delay vs supertap software

Waves was a huge part of what made that happen, and they paved the way for hundreds of other software developers to make their own plugins. Amateurs could sound pro, pros didn't have to use an analog studio, and analog studios didn't just have to use the gear they had in house. There was a huge democratization happening.

#Waves h delay vs supertap pro

Pro studios also could expand their existing arsenal of sounds to gear they didn't have in studio. And all of the sudden, the pro studio wasn't as much of a requirement as it was. They developed a reputation for creating high quality, albeit expensive, plugins that put the sound of a SSL, a Pultec, a Fairchild, in the hands of Joe Blow. Most DAWs included pretty shitty sounding stock plugins, which were very limited. With Steinberg inventing the VST standard, the stage was set for software designers to realize the market for amateurs, or pros outside of the studio system, wanting to get the pro studio sound, without having to pay to use that studio. That was the dream for a lot of amateur musicians in the 2000's. The album was made in 1993, so obviously before when I'm talking about, but also had a million dollar home studio behind it. I'm a huge fan of NIN, and The Downward Spiral was one of the first albums to be recorded into a computer, often from tape, but still. But they had hundreds of thousands of dollars of analog gear behind them to make the digital gear sound killer.

Big studios absolutely could afford the previously expensive computers to digitize tape, or record digitally to save on tape, and allow for more flexible editing, more tracks, ECT. It's that they are extremely deceptive about the cost of them.įirstly, a bit if a history on Waves, and their slow fall from grace.īack in the early 2000's, and the influx of affordable computers, which resulted in the feasibility of DAW being usable by amateurs and studioless pros, there was a growing market of people wanting to capture the sound of pro studios. It's not that they don't make good products, because they do. My issue with Waves is there horrible business model, which I could only discribe as predatory. If it's a good product, and has a good price, I'm all for it. I mean, I'm a huge fan of Boss pedals, AMD CPUs, Yamaha studio monitors, ECT. Nothing is wrong with Waves being the budget friendly opinion out there. Do they sound absolutely amazing and better than anything else? Well, no, but they don't need to either. Waves plugins are also super reasonably priced, especially if you catch them on sale, and they are on sale a lot. Non-linear summing emulation? Good luck finding a good selection of choices. Do you want an API channel strip? Well, count on one hand your opinions. Waves offers native plugins that very few other manufacturers sell. Here's the thing, Waves plugins sound great for the money.